Hornstine v. Moorestown
Hornstine v. Moorestown (full caption Hornstine v. Township of Moorestown, 263 F.Supp.2d 887) was a 2003 case in U.S. Federal District Court that considered whether grades received by a student with a...
Curley v. NAMBLA
Curley v. NAMBLA was a wrongful death lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in 2000, by Barbara and Robert Curley against the North American Man/Boy Love ...
Fox v. Franken
Fox News Network, LLC, v. Penguin Group (USA), Inc., and Alan S. Franken (2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18693; 31 Media L. Rep. 2254) was a civil lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Sout...
Pacific Century International, Ltd. v. Does
Pacific Century International, Ltd. v. Does 1-101 is a court case where Pacific Century International requested to subpoena the names and identities of 101 BitTorrent users (elsewhere noted as Does) w...
Pacific Century International, Ltd. v. Does - Wikipedia
Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio
Castillo v. Case Farms of Ohio, 96 F Supp. 2d 578, is a case involving poor working conditions for migratory workers. It established that an principal / agent relationship existed between Case Farms...
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Anderson
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Anderson, et al., Civil Action No. 08-11364, was a challenge brought by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to prevent three Massachuset...
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Anderson - Wikipedia
AMD v. Intel
AMD v. Intel was an antitrust lawsuit, filed by Advanced Micro Devices ("AMD") against Intel Corporation in June 2005.
AMD launched the lawsuit against its rival Intel, the world's leading micropr...
Field v. Google
Field v. Google, Inc., 412 F.Supp. 2d 1106 (D. Nev. 2006) is a case where Google Inc. successfully defended a lawsuit for copyright infringement. Field argued that Google infringed his exclusive righ...
Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation
Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation, et al. is a lawsuit filed on February 26, 2008, in a United States district court. The suit, based on the common law theory of nuisance, claims monetary damages fro...
Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation - Wikipedia
United States v. Stickrath
United States v. Stickrath, 242 F. 151 (D.C. S. D. Ohio 1917). , is a case that was decided by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, in which it was r...
TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp.
TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp. is a case stretching from 2004 to 2011, which took place in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for ...
Estate of Rodriquez v. Drummond Co.
Estate of Rodriquez v. Drummond Co. was a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama by relatives of dead relatives that were employees of Drummond Company....
Access Now v. Southwest Airlines
Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co. was a decision of the United States District Court on 18 August 2002. It concerned the nature of Title III of Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The c...
Blakey v. Continental Airlines
Blakey v. Continental Airlines, 992 F.Supp. 731 (D.N.J. 1998) and 164 N.J. 38 (2000), is a case concerning whether an employer must be held liable for harassment that can potentially occur on internal...
United States v. Hubbard
United States v. Hubbard was a 1978 criminal court case charging Mary Sue Hubbard and several other members of the Church of Scientology with violations of various laws including:U.S.C. 18 §§ 2 (Aidin...
United States v. Hubbard - Wikipedia
Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School District
Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School district, 30 F. Supp. 2d 1175 (E.D. Mo. 1998) is an important case in United States law regarding the First Amendment and its application in public schools. It was de...
United States v. Ivanov
United States v. Ivanov was an American court case addressing subject-matter jurisdiction for computer crimes performed by Internet users outside of the United States against American businesses and i...
United States v. Ivanov - Wikipedia
Dannielynn Birkhead paternity case
The Dannielynn Hope Marshall Birkhead paternity case, a.k.a. Birkhead v. Marshall, centered on a child born September 7, 2006 to Vickie Lynn Marshall (better known as Anna Nicole Smith). The child was...
United States v. Scheinberg
United States v. Scheinberg, 10 Cr. 336 (2011), is a United States federal criminal case against the founders of the three largest online poker companies, PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker and Cereus (Absol...
United States v. Scheinberg - Wikipedia
Fisher v. Dees
Fisher v. Dees was a 1986 case whose judgement refined the doctrine of fair use in American copyright law.
In 1984, Rick Dees, a disc jockey, sought and was refused permission to use Marvin Fisher...
Fisher v. Dees - Wikipedia
United States v. One Book Called Ulysses
United States v. One Book Called Ulysses was a 1933 case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dealing with freedom of expression. At issue was whether James Joyce'...
Hayden v. Pataki
Hayden v. Pataki is a legal challenge to New York State's law disenfranchising individuals convicted of felonies while in prison and on parole. The initial pro se complaint was filed in the U.S. Distr...
Anderson v. Stallone
Anderson v. Stallone, 11 USPQ2D 1161 (C.D. Cal. 1989) was a copyright infringement lawsuit against Sylvester Stallone, MGM, and other parties over a script for Stallone's film Rocky IV. This script w...
Dr. Marcus Conant, et al., v. McCaffrey et al.
Dr. Marcus Conant, et al., v. McCaffrey et al. (later, Conant v. Walters) is a legal case decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on September 7, 2000, whic...